Add @STOREX row support to TransferBack Completed

Chris Best

Hi Boyum,

 

Universal Function Macros can do the following:

Transfer($[$38.1.0.@STORE1]|$[$38.1.0.@STORE2])

But the reverse functionality:

TransferBack($[$38.1.0.@STORE1]|$[$38.1.0.@STORE2])

Does not work as TransferBack cannot use @STOREX for the row.

 

Chris

Comments

3 comments

Date Votes
  • Comment author
    Rasmus Jensen
    • Official comment

    Thank you for the feedback. We will look into this and see if it is something that can be fixed (there is a few legacy things that prevent @STORE system to be used everywhere)

  • Comment author
    Peter Hummelshøj Johnsen

    We have now looked into this, and have been unable to reproduce the issue, and have had no problems using the @STOREX in the transfer back command.

    I have attached a screenshot of the macro used to test with, if there is something different from your scenario reply to the post and we will investigate further.

    Will until then set this request as completed.

    0
  • Comment author
    Chris Best

    Hi Peter,

    I tried and you are correct that transferback is working for me in the latest version. I posted this after opening support ticket 37921 when I had issues. Possibly something changed between now and then.

     

    Thanks!

     

    Chris

    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.