Add @STOREX row support to TransferBack

Completed

Chris Best

• May 31, 2017 15:34

Hi Boyum,

 

Universal Function Macros can do the following:

Transfer($[$38.1.0.@STORE1]|$[$38.1.0.@STORE2])

But the reverse functionality:

TransferBack($[$38.1.0.@STORE1]|$[$38.1.0.@STORE2])

Does not work as TransferBack cannot use @STOREX for the row.

 

Chris

Vote

0

• Official comment

  

  Rasmus Jensen

  • October 24, 2017 13:31

  Thank you for the feedback. We will look into this and see if it is something that can be fixed (there is a few legacy things that prevent @STORE system to be used everywhere)
• 

  Peter Hummelshøj Johnsen

  • November 02, 2017 08:54

  We have now looked into this, and have been unable to reproduce the issue, and have had no problems using the @STOREX in the transfer back command.

  I have attached a screenshot of the macro used to test with, if there is something different from your scenario reply to the post and we will investigate further.

  

  Will until then set this request as completed.
• 

  Chris Best

  • November 02, 2017 16:08

  Hi Peter,

  I tried and you are correct that transferback is working for me in the latest version. I posted this after opening support ticket 37921 when I had issues. Possibly something changed between now and then.

   

  Thanks!

   

  Chris

Please sign in to leave a comment.